There are people out there who consider themselves some form of Anarchist, particularly Anarchro-Capitalists, who also support the idea of Private Property. These people tend to also consider themselves Libertarians of some sort.
How do you enforce Private Property without Government? You can't, Private Property is a Government mandated monopoly.
I have a Playlist on YouTube of videos against Copyright and Intellectual Property Laws. At the moment most videos on it, and they will probably always be the start of it, are from Libertarians arguing against it from a Libertarian POV. I suspect they qualify as Anarchro-Capitalists as well. On at least one of those videos there was a comment about how all these arguments against Intellectual Property can be used against any form of Private Property.
It is mainly Land Ownership I care about here. I'm against having a government mandated monopoly over control of a portion of The Earth itself.
I am among many who reject the idea that Communism is compatible with
Socialism, because true Communism is Anarchistic. If I have a political
ideology at all, it is a form of Libertarian-Communism or Anarchist-Communism.
To us Socialism is not an alternative to Capitalism, Socialism is
Capitalism where the State is the Capitalist,, that goes for the USSR,
China, North Korea and Cuba.
Many Libertarian Communists make a distinction between Private Property
and Personal Property. But the key issue is we believe that the means
of production should be shared.
The members of the Society of the Friends of Truth, founded by Nicholas Bonnevile included men like Condorcet and his wife Sophie, Sylvian Marchel, Francois "Gracchus" Babeuf, and Olympe de Gouges.
Their contemporary kin in the English speaking world included Thomas
Jefferson and Thomas Paine (and John Oswald). But in Germany strangely enough included
some members of the controversial Bavarian Illuminati, chiefly Kingge. I'm still a conspiracy theorist, but one who's come largely to view the hype around the Bavarian Illuminati as a distraction.
Marco di Luchetti has made an English Translation of one of Bonneville's books.
And in the introduction talks at length about the ideology and politics
of the group. on things like Property and Taxation. He is wrong in how
he massively overstates Bonneville's connection to the Illuminati, and
in confusing Iluminism with the Illuminati, Terry Melanson is a better historian on The Illuminati.
Bonneville like Jefferson publicly defended the Illuminati but there is
no evidence he was a member, if he'd been recruited by Bode it would be
mentioned in Bode's memoirs of his trip to France which we still have.
But he's very good at describing the different political factions of
the Revolution.
Upon reading Marco di Luchetti's book, I definitely still have areas of
disagreement with Bonneville and Brissiot, chiefly their Preemptive War
policy.
Robespierre was a Demagogue and a Statist. In truth he was more a
Monarchist then the Royalists, but wanted himself to be the Dictator.
The marriage of Communism and Socialism began with Buonarroti.
He was a follower of Robespierre, and has also been claimed to be an
Illuminati member though there is no documentation that he was. He was an important
figure in the history of the Carbonari and Italian Freemasonry.
Mazzini then carried on his mantle in a more militant and Nationalist
form leading to Italian Fascism. And at the same time Bounarroti
influenced Karl Marx and Engels.
So I don't have an exact model of how I feel Libertarian-Communism
should look. But this is all stuff I feel Libertarians need to start
rethinking our assumptions on.
Post Script:
This isn't the first post on this blog more about arguing a belief of mine from a Secular POV. Many people I'm talking to here might be put off by the very title of this blog. Yet I don't feel like it would fit on any of my existing blogs. Should I start a new one?
I've already argued for Libertarian-Comunisim from a Biblical Perspective in my post The Bible and Private Property. Much of this was copied/pasted from there, but not the opening paragraphs.
No comments:
Post a Comment