https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eijYEYzAQu0
In the modern world Indivdualism is associated with certain ideologies that in America at least are generally classified as Conservative. Now a lot of these people are Conservative Atheists, Ayn Rand was an Atheist, she knew her brand of Individualism was utterly incompatible with proper Christian values. But some of these Conservatives are Christians like Jordan Peterson who's technically Canadian but the thing about Canada is if your a Conservative in Canada you probably obsess over America in reaction to how much Canadian Liberalism is founded on hating America.
However a more obscure figure in the modern YouTube Right is a channel called TIK who have made some interesting videos on Hitler and Mussolini being one of the few YouTubers interested in acknowledging their differences, both are bad but they had differences that make Hitler worse, however being better then Hitler is not a grand endorsement. In one video of his I watched he talks about the history of states and power systems from his POV and then says Jesus introduced the concept of the Individual. So I assume that means to him the difference between the Old Testament and the New Testament is that the Old Testament is Collectivist since it's about Israel and the New Testament's innovation was that now God made Covenants with Individuals not a Collective.
This view of the New Testament doesn't hold up. Anything you can make sound Individualist about the New Testament was already there in The Torah, the punishments already punished individuals for example. The actual innovation of the New Testament is that it's expanding the Collective, or rather returning God's focus to all of Adamkind.
The TNAK starts out about all of Humanity, the first 10 and a half chapters of Genesis. And on occasion YHWH reminded Israel that he still cares about the rest of the world like in Ezekiel 16 (the parts about Sodom) and Daniel 2-7.
In Matthew Jesus talks about gentiles entering the Kingdom before some of the Children of the Kingdom, that's not an expression of Individualism but of outsiders being let into the Collective.
The Sheeps and Goats Judgment in Matthew 25 is defined as being of "Nations" not Individuals.
Paul in Romans 5 talks about all being made Sinners because of one Man's Sin, but then all being made righteous because of one Man's righteousness, similar to how he discuses Death and Resurrection in 1 Corinthians 15. Then in Romans 11 he says the fullness of the "Nations" will be grafted into Israel and then ALL Israel shall be Saved. And that God consigned ALL to disobedience so that He might have Mercy on ALL.
Elsewhere The New Testament talks about The Church being the Bride of Christ and Body of Christ and Temple of God. Inherently Collectivist symbolism. Even when Paul brings our Individual being Individual Temples of the Holy Ghost in 1 Corinthians 3:16-17 and 6:18-20 it's tied into that grander doctrine and clearly arguing agaisnt Lockean Self Ownership (or Body Ownership as some modern libertarian prefer to rephrase it) our Bodies are ultimately owned by God but also collectively shared with the rest of the Community of Believers.
It was the advent of Calvinism V. Armianism that laid the foundation of Individualizing The Gospel, in both those systems Salvation is a covenant with an Individual they only disagree on who to give the agency in that Covenant. ColdCrashPictures calls Objectivism "Prosperity Gospel for Atheists" an analogy that immediately reminded me of my own calling Existentialism is Atheistic Arminianism.
But not all Collectivist Ideologies are good, Fascism is very Collectivist as is Nationalism. That's why I stress how The Gospel is an Inclusivist Collectivism.
It was Gerrard Winstanley who introduced Universal Salvation to the Modern-English speaking world, and he was also a Communist. What untied the true Gospel and Communism so naturally is that both are founded on the true Collectivist perspective of The New Testament.
Paul in Romans 5 talks about all being made Sinners because of one Man's Sin, but then all being made righteous because of one Man's righteousness, similar to how he discuses Death and Resurrection in 1 Corinthians 15. Then in Romans 11 he says the fullness of the "Nations" will be grafted into Israel and then ALL Israel shall be Saved. And that God consigned ALL to disobedience so that He might have Mercy on ALL.
Elsewhere The New Testament talks about The Church being the Bride of Christ and Body of Christ and Temple of God. Inherently Collectivist symbolism. Even when Paul brings our Individual being Individual Temples of the Holy Ghost in 1 Corinthians 3:16-17 and 6:18-20 it's tied into that grander doctrine and clearly arguing agaisnt Lockean Self Ownership (or Body Ownership as some modern libertarian prefer to rephrase it) our Bodies are ultimately owned by God but also collectively shared with the rest of the Community of Believers.
It was the advent of Calvinism V. Armianism that laid the foundation of Individualizing The Gospel, in both those systems Salvation is a covenant with an Individual they only disagree on who to give the agency in that Covenant. ColdCrashPictures calls Objectivism "Prosperity Gospel for Atheists" an analogy that immediately reminded me of my own calling Existentialism is Atheistic Arminianism.
But not all Collectivist Ideologies are good, Fascism is very Collectivist as is Nationalism. That's why I stress how The Gospel is an Inclusivist Collectivism.
It was Gerrard Winstanley who introduced Universal Salvation to the Modern-English speaking world, and he was also a Communist. What untied the true Gospel and Communism so naturally is that both are founded on the true Collectivist perspective of The New Testament.
Update: Here is another good Peter Hiett Sermon.
No comments:
Post a Comment