In Jeremiah 22:28-30 Yahuah puts a Curse on Jeconiah, calling him Coniah.
Is this man Coniah a despised broken idol? is he a vessel wherein is no pleasure? wherefore are they cast out, he and his seed, and are cast into a land which they know not? O earth, earth, earth, hear the word of Yahuah. Thus saith Yahuah, Write ye this man childless, a man that shall not prosper in his days: for no man of his seed shall prosper, sitting upon the throne of David, and ruling any more in Judah.And this gets used to say clearly Jesus (and his half siblings) are not eligible to inherit The Throne of David.
Now it makes some sense to me for Atheists to use this as a criticism of The Biblical record as a whole. But as I'm about to show using this as a Jewish objection to Jesus doesn't really think things through.
Jeremiah is the only Biblical Author to mention this Curse. And he's the Prophet who explains that Yahuah reverses His Blessings and Curses based on obedience in places like Chapter 18. Ezekiel, the other major Prophet of that time, not only doesn't seem to view Jeconiah as Cursed but seems to never regard Zedekiah as a rightful King at all since he dates events of Zedekiah's reign as if Jeconiah was still King.
Earlier in Jeremiah 22 setting the stage for this Curse Yahuah says in verse 24.
As I live, saith Yahuah, though Coniah the son of Jehoiakim king of Judah were the signet upon my right hand, yet would I pluck thee thence;Compare this to Haggai 2:23 where Yahuah says of Coniah's grandson Zerubabel.
In that day, saith Yahuah of hosts, will I take thee, O Zerubbabel, my servant, the son of Shealtiel, saith Yahuah, and will make thee as a signet: for I have chosen thee, saith Yahuah of hosts.So that's clearly a reversal, exactly what Jeconiah lost according to Jeremiah 22 Zerubabel has back according to Haggai. And other Prophets of this time like Zechariah speak similarly of Zerubabel.
And indeed the line of Exilarchs acknowledged by Rabbinic Judaism as the heirs of David in Exile all descended from Zerubabel.
People making this objection often also claim it has to be strictly Pater-Lineal descent, so that leaves out the lines coming through Hillel The Elder who was a Benjamite, his Davidic descent was though his Mother, and through a son of David even further removed from Solomon then Nathan was.
So without the house of Zerubabel, we have no known descent from the Royal Line.
I thank you for sharing your thoughts and theories, they are always very insightful and interesting. What do you think of the argument that there are two Jeconiah's, one the cursed one and another the one Jesus is (presumably) a descendant of? Is there two Jeconiah's.
ReplyDeleteLike argued here:
https://www.quora.com/Is-there-two-Jeconiahs-One-cursed-and-the-other-not-whom-Jesus-descends-from/answer/LeEric-Marvin?ch=10&oid=1477743747778648&share=381899fe&srid=3vUiJs&target_type=answer
I don't think that's likely, these kinds of Genealogies just do skip generations sometimes.
DeleteBut thank you for sharing.